Editor-Author Relationship: Part I

 

By Mick Spillane

 

I started working in publishing as a summer job. I then got a more serious job as an international marketing assistant at Scholastic, Inc. Marketing was not really where I wanted to be in publishing. I then found a real job in publishing: the coveted "assistant editor" position while I was in graduate school. It was SIGS Books and Multimedia/Cambridge University Press. It was here that I learned to be an editor. I learned from my boss Lothlórien—yes named after fairiest forest realm in The Lord of the Rings. I learned that the author comes first; to respect the author no matter what.

 

It is here that I began to understand that being a great editor could come down to one thing: personal relations. Yes, something that simple—the relationship between the editor and the author. To do a great editing job on a manuscript, you need to have a great working relationship with the author—even if that is at a great distance.

 

An editor is not just dealing with words on paper. The editor deals with many human factors: the author is a real person revealing, perhaps, a very personal part of himself or herself. Not just to the editor, but to the public.

 

A manuscript is not usually written in a day. It may take the author years to complete writing their manuscript. The author probably sacrificed a lot for their writing; their family might have endured sacrifices for the writing of the manuscript. It required physical and mental effort; there may even be a professional reputation at stake.

 

There is not a section in the Chicago Manual of Style on how an Editor-Author relationship will be successful. You may find yourself working with an author who is confident, stubborn, worried, argumentative, confrontational, nervous, or a combination of all these. Whether the author is composed or nervous, the best approach is to be kind—and to find the good in the manuscript.



Comments

There are no entries yet.
Please enter the code
* Required fields